Skip to main content
Accessibility icon

History and Scholarly Research: A Blended Approach

Suffolk County Community College

Description:

History and Scholarly Research: A Blended Approach

A structured research assignment is often the culmination of most social sciences and humanities courses within higher education. These assignments tend to be paired with 1-2 library instruction sessions that take place during the course of a semester. During these time-limited sessions, students are instructed by academic librarians on matters of scholarly research and are prepared to effectively approach their respective research assignments. While library instruction is both beneficial and necessary to the success of student research, conducting such instruction within a limited amount of time can hinder an academic librarian’s ability to ensure that their students attain all scholarly research learning outcomes. When transitioning to online learning, these library instructions are often allotted even less time, reduced to tutorials, or simply eliminated. Such measures curb student online learning and diminish the quality of their research-based assignments. In addressing such issues, I have redesigned my online history courses to provide comprehensive and blended research instruction which runs concurrently with existing history content modules. Through the course of a semester, my online learners will successfully meet their history and scholarly research learning objectives simultaneously and progressively.

A well-constructed research assignment requires a process. Researchers must adhere to multiple steps that include, but might not be limited to, the following:

• The formulation of a viable and valid research question.
• The proficiency of scholarly databases,
• The evaluation of sources.
• The examination of multiple voices.
• The proper citation of sources.

As alluded to previously, these processes are often taught by academic librarians who are allotted a limited amount of time within a specific course. These time constraints can pose difficulties in ensuring that learners are provided a comprehensive lesson and assessment. In my online history course design, the scholarly research process is weaved into existing course content modules thus providing research instruction that spans the course of a semester. History and scholarly research are presented side-by-side to provide enhanced instruction while demonstrating the inter-connectivity of the two disciplines. Here is an example of a course module’s topics and learning objectives:

Topics covered:

• Capital & Labor
• The West
• Formulating viable research topics/questions.

Learning Objectives:

Upon completion of this module, you will be able to:

• Examine how capital and labor became paramount leading up to the end of the 19th century, and how their proliferation impacted individuals and society as a whole.
• Identify America's reasons for westward expansion and evaluate the impact of these actions.
• Formulate research topics/questions that are viable and appropriate for historical research.

Aside from Capital & Labor and The West, this particular module addresses an initial and crucial step in the research process: formulating a research topic or question. All three of the topics in this module are aligned with their own specific content and assessments, but the research-related topic (formulating viable research topics/questions) is presented through the lens of Capital & Labor and The West. Student inquiries and curiosities – which are paramount to the formulation of research topics/questions – arise from the study of Capital & Labor and The West. Rather than address history and the scholarly research process individually, this module and others like it adhere the two together.

The structure and integrity of this course design is maintained through a series of sequential folders containing readings, resources, and several short assessments. All content is found within the weekly modules, and all modules are given a similar structure to maintain consistency.
This course design was first implemented in the Fall 2020 semester, and a subsequent implementation is taking place during the Spring 2021 semester. Initial assessments have shown an overall improvement in the quality of student research paper assignments and their subsequent grades. In addition, the insertion of scholarly research instruction into online history courses has had no negative effects on the existing assessments of history-based learning.

This course was designed from my perspectives as an academic librarian, a professor of history, and an online educator. I strongly believe that this course design can act as a template of sorts for professionals in various disciplines wishing to collaborate with academic librarians to implement extended library instruction within their existing courses.

Supplemental Resources:

HIS104_SampleModule.pdf

88 reviews of this entry
5.0 rating based on 84 ratings
5.0 rating based on 84 ratings

  1. Embedding library learning into a course is very important for successful remote learning. Based on the outline of this work above, this is exactly the kind of work that students need to be successful in this new modality. I applauded this work and recommend others work with their faculty to include this kind of modules into their own teaching.

  2. I think that incorporating a process for looking at how you might dig deeper into a topic is good – formulate research questions could be a good way to assess learning and understanding. What I would like to know though if the same breadth of content is covered. If the development of the research question is 1/3 of the assignment shown here, are the same number of topics addressed for the entire course? And, is the development of the research question a learning object of the course too?

  3. I think that “providing comprehensive and blended research instruction which runs concurrently with existing history content modules” is an excellent idea and that the concept could be applied to most Disciplines.

  4. This most excellent and gets to the core of the nuances of online learning. The embedded online library elements is perfect. This really is seated in current theories that inform the structure of online learning. This should be a standard approach to online instructional design and pedagogy.

  5. Great work Fabio! Very thoughtful in how you have blended your courses with the importance of scholarly research. I look forward to seeing how your continued data collection shows what I’m sure will be excellent results. Thank you for sharing!

  6. Combining your library science expertise into your online history course greatly enhances the students’ learning experience, benefiting them in every aspect of their education. Great job, Fabio!

  7. As with all great ideas, it seems strange that the concept was not more commonplace before. Your work wonderfully blends all of the assets the College has to offer students in their pursuit of education: expert instruction in the field, an introduction to the research materials available through the library, and the know-how to be able to select and evaluate information best suited to their topic of study. Well done! I hope your future data will make the case for this to become the new standard for instruction.

  8. This is an excellent approach for teaching students the appropriate steps in a research project. A need-to-know is much more memorable than a stand-alone short library lesson. I think this approach would also be effective with high school students.

  9. You’ve touched upon an important and timely subject. As we progress in this tech heavy world, this is the type of thinking that will enable educators to meet the demands of learning environments in the future.